북한 급변사태 가능성에 대한 우려가 증가하고 있는 가운데, 주한미군은 수년 안에 특수지뢰방호차량인 MRAP (Mine Resistant Ambush Protected) 80대 이상 한반도 배치를 추진 중이라고 밝혔다.
2012년 미군은 MRAP의 한반도 운용 적합성에 대한 평가를 한 후에, 2사단 운용이 부적합하다는 평가를 내렸었다. 그럼에도 80대 이상의 MRAP 배치를 추진하는 것은 북한 급변사태를 고려한 것이 아니냐는 분석이 나오고 있다.
미육군성의 승인하게 되면, 한국에 있는 미군기지에 MRAP이 배치될 것이라고 미8군측은 설명했다. 미군은 MRAP의 배치 뿐만 아니라, 2월 기계화보병부대 순환 배치 계획을 포함해 대북 억지력을 강화하고 있는 상황이다. 전문가들은 주한미군이 북한 김정은 국방위원장의 고모부인 장성택 처형이후 불안해진 안보상황을 감안해 군사력을 보강하고 있다고 분석하고 있다.
MRAP은 미 지상군의 아프간 이라크 전쟁에서 큰 역할을 했다. 특히 MRAP은 전투상황에서 급조폭발물로부터 전투병들의 목숨을 지켜내는데 일조했다.
<관련 영문 기사>
U.S. Army to deploy more than 80 MRAPs
Observers say the envisioned deployment appears aimed at strengthening preparedness for possible N.K. instability
The Eighth U.S. Army is seeking to deploy more than 80 Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles to South Korea in the coming years in an apparent move to strengthen its preparedness for possible scenarios of North Korean instability.
The EUSA said that pending approval from the U.S. Department of Army, the heavily armored vehicles will be sent from outside Korea to unspecified U.S. military units on the peninsula. Currently, there are no MRAPs in Korea.
“Recognizing the value of MRAPs, the Eighth Army identified an enduring requirement for MRAPs for use in support of both logistics and command and control operations,” the army told The Korea Herald. “Eighth Army continues to work closely with the Department of the Army in the planning, procurement and fielding of more than 80 MRAPs in the coming years.”
The envisioned deployment of the combat vehicles comes after the U.S. Army’s feasibility study in 2012 determined the MRAP was “unsuitable for combined-arms maneuver units” within the 2nd Infantry Division.
According to the U.S. military newspaper Stars and Stripes, the 2nd ID said last August that the vehicles were “not suitable for maneuver battalions to use” in Korea, and that there were no plans to add the MRAP to its fleet in the “foreseeable future.”
“Eighth Army concluded MRAPs provided enhanced capabilities for other Eighth Army units (rather than the Second Infantry Division),” the EUSA said.
The U.S. Army’s pursuit of the vehicles here came as concerns rise over possible instability in the unpredictable state led by the inexperienced dynastic ruler Kim Jong-un. The execution last month of Jang Song-thaek, Kim’s once-powerful uncle, has further worsened the security jitters here and throughout the region.
Apparently mindful of the relentless security threats from the North, the U.S. Forces Korea has been strengthening its deterrence capabilities with a set of new plans for military reinforcements.
The U.S. plans to deploy to the peninsula a dozen F-16 fighters along with 300 troops this month and an 800-strong mechanized infantry battalion next month, both on a rotational basis.
In case of instability in the North, MRAPs would be of great use for U.S. military operations possibly including stabilization activities in the North, as witnessed in battlefields in Iraq and Afghanistan, analysts said.
“In case of a crisis in North Korea, there would be a situation for ground troops to move into the North across the Military Demarcation Line, strewn with a huge amount of land mines. For this, there should be equipment such as the MRAP that could penetrate through it,” said Park Won-gon, a security expert at Handong Global University.
“The possibility of an all-out war remains low for now. But for various scenarios of instability in North Korea, there needs to be such a vehicle to secure routes possibly for North Koreans to move into the South (out of harm’s way) and for those from the South to enter the North.”
Pyongyang has expressed its displeasure over the introduction of MRAPs into South Korea, arguing that the vehicles are intended to mount an attack on it and would aggravate regional tensions.
With its V-shaped hulls, MRAPs served as a centerpiece of U.S. troops’ protection against improvised explosive devices and other bomb attacks during their battle operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
After more than a decade of the warfare, the U.S. Army has been slashing the number of the MRAPs due to high maintenance costs and its strategic calculation that intense ground wars that require U.S. engagement would be unlikely for some time.
By Song Sang-ho (
sshluck@heraldcorp.com)
